The idea that Government withhold information for your public has become outdated. During the last decade, many countries have enacted legislations on freedom of information. In India, the state Secrets Act 1923 was enacted to safeguard the official secrets. The newest law intend to disclose information replacing the ' culture of secrecy '. It will promote public accountability that will trim the malpractices, mismanagement, abuse of discretion and bribery etc. - revolution
OBJECTIVES: The thing of RTI is to empower the citizens, promote transparency and accountability inside the working of the Government. The Act is a big step towards making the citizens informed about the activities of the Government. Social Activist Aruna Roy has described India's RTI as " the most fundamental law this country has seen."
Aftereffect of RIGHT TO INFORMATION: While the debate on corruption in the country rages on, the RTI Act is fast growing as a good anti- corruption tool.
Jan Lok Pal Bill gained tremendous public support with citizens released on the streets of Delhi, Bangalore and other cities to voice their anger over corruption. Where RTI has been utilized by journalists and also the media, the law features a broad base of users. Earlier right to freedom of speech and expression is granted under Article 19(1) of Constitution, nevertheless it requires fair and efficient procedure to really make the freedom of information work. In the first three years, 2 million RTI requests were filed. The first and well known movement was by Mazdoor Kissan Shakti Sangathan (MKSS) in Rajasthan for the access to village accounts. Case studies and media reports implies that RTI is being used to redress individual grievances, access entitlements such as Ration Cards and pension. The RTI has paved way for informed citizenry which will strengthen the democratic Government of India. With this Act, we are able to use our directly to speech and expressions and control the us government activities effectively. The thought of open Government has become a reality with the implementation of RTI Act. The RTI may be called a success as long as the bureaucracy accepts they've constitutional to serve into.
PROVISIONS OF RTI: Section 3 says all citizens shall have to information. The Act enforces a duty upon the public authorities to disclosed all the. In V.S.Lee V. State of Kerala.. the remedy given by Parliament is that wherever there is certainly substantial financial support, the People, have the right to know or information. Section 4(2) claims that every public authority shall take constant steps to offer information suo moto to the public. Thus, the authorities have to give information voluntarily so the public have minimum turn to use this Act. The public authorities also have to disseminate (making known or communicated the information to the public through notice boards, newspapers, public announcements, media broad casts, internet and inspection of offices of public authority) information widely of any type which is easily accessible for the public. Information can be purchased by request written or through electronic means in English or Hindi or in official language with the area U/S 6. Here, the individual has to give fees, and if request can't be made in writing, the Central PIO and State PIO shall render all assist with make request in writing form. If the information has been provided correctly or within time, it may be made available by appeal or complaint towards the Information Commission U/S (8(a) 1). In The Registrar General V. K.U. Rajasekar, it was held that Section 8 of RTI specially handles the cases of exemption from disclosure or information when such information affects prejudicially the sovereignty and security asia etc. Section 5 says every public authority shall within 100 days of enactment of the Act, designate up to officers as the Central Public Information Officers or State Public Information Officers. - revolution